Ecology, Environment and Conservation Paper

Vol. 22, April Suppl. Issue 2016; Page No.(245-254)

APPRAISAL OF ON-FARM WATER DISTRIBUTION IN LATERAL COMMANDS OF UPPER KRISHNA PROJECT, KARNATAKA

N.K. Rajeshkumar, P. Balakrishnan, U. Satishkumar, B.S. Polisgowdar, B.K. Desai and H. Lokesha

Abstract

Post-independence development of irrigation in India was phenomenal, which greatly contributed for ‘green revolution’ and achieving food production targets. However, poor operating efficiencies of irrigation projects due to unscientific management of land and water resources and inappropriate cropping pattern in the command areas have posed serious concern. This has led to excess irrigation application, conveyance losses and wastage of water through outlets with low crop yields. The financial returns were not commensurate with the investments made in irrigation sector and there were also problems of waterlogging and salinity. Keeping these aspects in view, a study was carried out on evaluation of land, water and cropping practices in different reaches of command areas of two selected laterals of the Upper Krishna Project (UKP), Karnataka during 2012-’14. The results revealed that cropping intensity in both the laterals was more in kharif season (73.25- 99.97 per cent) compared to rabi season (15.94-75.13 per cent). Paddy area was pre-dominant, though it was not at all considered in the originally envisaged cropping pattern. There were excess inflows at the lateral heads than actually required, ranging from 27.94-51.76 per cent and 42.49-56.44 per cent with water demand-delivery ratios of 0.48-0.72 and 0.44-0.58 in kharif and rabi seasons respectively. Similarly, the excess irrigation application than required at field level varied from 21.11-27.98 per cent and from 21.03-30.54 per cent during kharif and rabi respectively. The conveyance and outlet losses observed ranged from 16.17-16.99 per cent and 6.83- 26.79 per cent in kharif and from 16.58-19.88 per cent and 19.40- 35.41 per cent in rabi respectively. Further, excess amounts of water applied more than the requirements to paddy, cotton, pigeonpea and chilli varied from 22.03-26.05, 18.16-22.69, 16.21-19.85, 15.67- 21.76 per cent for during kharif and from 18.71-25.07, 10.45-21.59, 14.79-17.42 and 10.76-21.87 per cent during rabi respectively. All the above losses were quite considerable and if they were minimised and put to efficient use, additionally 4.88-62.90 ha in kharif and 10.34- 69.18 ha in rabi season could have been cropped with high to light irrigated crops, which in turn would have fetched higher farm returns. Moreover, as the water table is shallow in some pockets of the lower reaches of the command area, canal water releases need to be regulated in conjunction with groundwater and adopting appropriate cropping pattern in different reaches of command areas. This would minimise the problems of water shortage in the tail-end areas, thereby would help in sustainability of irrigated agriculture.

Enter your contact information below to receive full paper.
Your Name :
Email:
Phone:
City:
Cost of Full Paper: Rs.75 for Indian Nationals or $20 (USD) for international subscribers.
By clicking on Request Paper you Agree to pay the above mentioned cost per paper.
  
Journal Issues
Vol 25, July Suppl. Issue, 2019
Vol 25, Issue 2 2019
Vol 25, May Suppl. Issue, 2019
Vol 25, April Suppl. Issue, 2019
Vol 25, Issue 1 2019
Vol 24, Issue 4 2018
Vol 24, Issue 3 2018
Vol 24, Issue 2 2018
Vol 24, Issue 1 2018
Vol 24, March Suppl. Issue 2018
Vol 24, Feb. Suppl. Issue 2018
Vol 23, Issue 4, 2017
Vol 23, Nov. Suppl. Issue 2017
Vol 23, Sept. Suppl. Issue 2017
Vol 23, Issue 2, 2017
Vol 23, Issue 3, 2017
Vol 23, Issue 1, 2017
Vol 23, Feb 2017 Suppl. Issue
Vol 22, Dec 2016 Suppl. Issue
Vol 22, Issue 4, 2016
Vol 22, Sept. Suppl. Issue , 2016
Vol 22, Issue 3, 2016
Vol. 22, June Suppl. Issue 2016
Vol 22, Issue 2, 2016
Vol. 22, April Suppl. Issue 2016
Vol 22, Issue 1, 2016
Vol 21, Issue 4, 2015
Vol. 21 Dec. 2015 Suppl. Issue
Vol. 21 Nov. 2015 Suppl. Issue
Vol 21, Issue 3, 2015
Vol 21, Issue 2, 2015
Vol. 21 Suppl.Issue August 2015
Vol 21.Suppl.Issue June 2015
Vol 21, Issue 1, 2015
Supplement Issue, Dec. 2014
Special Issue-2014
Vol 20, Issue 4, 2014
Vol 20, Issue 3, 2014
Vol 20, Issue 2, 2014
Vol. 20 Issue 01, 2014
Vol. 19 Issue 04, 2013
Vol. 19 Issue 03, 2013
Vol. 19, Issue 02, 2013
Vol. 19, Issue 01, 2013
Vol.18, Issue 04, 2012
Vol.18, Issue 3, 2012
Vol.18, Issue 2, 2012
Vol.18, Issue 1, 2012
Vol.17, Issue 4, 2011
Vol.17, Issue 3, 2011
Vol.17, Issue 2, 2011
Vol.17, Issue 1, 2011
Vol.16, Issue 4, 2010
Vol.16, Issue 3, 2010
Vol.16, Issue 2, 2010
Vol.16, Issue 1, 2010
Vol.15, Issue 04, 2009
Vol.15, Issue 03, 2009
Vol.15, Issue 02, 2009
Vol.15, Issue 1, 2009
Vol.14, Issue 04, 2008
Vol.14, Issue 2-3, 2008
Vol.14, Issue 2-3, 2008
Vol.14, Issue 1, 2008
Vol.14, Issue 2-3, 2008
Vol.13, Issue 04, 2007
Vol.13, Issue 2, 2007
Vol.13, Issue 1, 2007
Vol.12, Issue 4, 2006
Vol.12, Issue 3, 2006
Vol.12, Issue 2, 2006
Vol.12, Issue 1, 2006
Vol.12, Issue 01, 2006
Vol.11, Issue 3,4, 2005
Vol.11, Issue 2, 2005
Vol.11, Issue 1, 2005
Vol.10, Issue 04, 2004
Vol.10, Issue 03, 2004
Vol.10, Issue 02, 2004
Vol.10, Issue 01, 2004
Vol.09, Issue 04, 2003
Vol.09, Issue 03, 2003
Vol.09, Issue 02, 2003
Vol.08, Issue 04, 2002
Vol.08, Issue 03, 2002
Vol.08, Issue 01, 2002
Vol.07, Issue 04, 2001
Vol.07, Issue 03, 2001
Vol.07, Issue 02, 2001
Vol.07, Issue 01, 2001
Vol.06, Issue 04, 2000
Vol.06, Issue 03, 2000
Vol.06, Issue 02, 2000
Vol.06, Issue 01, 2000
Vol.05, Issue 04, 1999
Vol.05, Issue 03, 1999
Vol.05, Issue 02, 1999
Vol.05, Issue 01, 1999
Vol.04, Issue 1,2, 1998
Vol.03, Issue 3,4, 1997
Vol.03, Issue 01, 1997
Vol.02, Issue 1,2, 1996
Vol.01, Issue 14, 1995
Looking for Past Issues? Click here to get them!!