QUALITY EVALUATION OF MILK SOLD IN AJMER CITY
BHARTI JAIN AND PUJA MATHUR
Abstract
The study was aimed to evaluate the quality of milk sold by vendors and organized dairies of
Ajmer city. Hundred samples of vendors milk were collected. Chemical analysis of milk is required to
ensure that minimum compositional standards are met and milk should be free from adulterants and
other contaminants. For chemical analysis Milko-Scan 133 was used to evaluate gross chemical
composition of milk in terms of water, fat, solid not fat, protein and lactose. Study revealed that all the
values of milk components except water were below the PFA standards. Forty one per cent samples
could not fulfill the standards for fat while 91 per cent samples were containing SNF less than 8.5 gm
per cent. Seventy six per cent and 96 per cent samples were not fulfilling the required standards for
protein and lactose respectively. Eighty one per cent of samples contained added water to the milk.
None of the samples were adulterated with starch, Sodium-bi-carbonate and urea. Sugar was found to
be only adulterant present in two per cent of raw milk samples. Milk supplied by organized dairies of
Ajmer fulfilled the required standards mentioned on the milk pouch. A significant positive correlation
was seen between price and fat content of milk and also between total solids and price of milk.
Enter your contact information below to receive full paper.
|
Journal Issues |
Vol 22, Issue 4, 2020
Vol 22, Issue 3, 2020
Vol 22, Issue 2, 2020
Vol 22, Issue 1, 2020
Vol 21, Issue 4, 2019
Vol 21, Nov. Suppl. Issue, 2019
Vol 21, Issue 3, 2019
Vol 21, Issue 2, 2019
Vol 21, Issue 1, 2019
Vol 20, Dec. Suppl. No.2, 2018
Vol 20, Issue 4, 2018
Vol 20, Dec. Suppl. Issue, 2018
Vol 20, Oct Suppl. Issue, 2018
Vol 20, Issue 3, 2018
Vol 20, Issue 2, 2018
Vol 20, Issue 1, 2018
Vol 20, Feb. Suppl. Issue, 2018
Vol 19, Issue 4, 2017
Vol 19, Nov. Suppl, Issue 2017
Vol 19, Issue 3, 2017
Vol 19, Issue 2, 2017
Vol 19, Issue 1, 2017
Vol 18, Issue 4, 2016
Vol 18, Issue 3, 2016
Vol 18, Issue 2, 2016
Vol 18, Issue 1, 2016
Vol 17, Issue 4, 2015
Vol 17, Issue 3, 2015
Vol. 17 Special Issue 2015
Vol 17, Issue 2, 2015
Vol 17, Issue 1, 2015
Vol 16, Issue 4, 2014
Vol 16, Issue 3, 2014
Vol 16, Issue 2, 2014
Vol 16, Issue 1, 2014
Vol 15, Issue 4, 2013
Vol 15, Issue 3, 2013
Vol 15, Issue 2, 2013
Vol 15 Issue 1, 2013
Vol 14, Issue 4, 2012
Vol 14, Issue 3, 2012
Vol 14, Issue 2, 2012
Vol.14, Issue 1, 2012
Vol.13, Issue 4, 2011
Vol.13, Issue 3, 2011
Vol.13, Issue 2, 2011
Vol.13, Issue 1, 2011
Vol.12, Issue 4, 2010
Vol.12, Issue 3, 2010
Vol.12, Issue 2, 2010
Vol.12, Issue 1, 2010
Vol 11, Issue 4, 2009
Vol 11, Issue 3, 2009
Vol 11, Issue 2, 2009
Vol 11, Issue 1, 2009
Vol 10, Issue 4, 2008
Vol 10, Issue 3, 2008
Vol 10, Issue 3, 2008
Vol 10, Issue 2, 2008
Vol 10, Issue 1, 2008
Vol 9, Issue 4, 2007
Vol 9, Issue 3, 2007
Vol 9, Issue 2, 2007
Vol 9, Issue 1, 2007
Vol 8, Issue 4, 2006
Vol 8, Issue 3, 2006
Vol 08, Issue 2, 2006
Vol 08, Issue 1, 2006
Vol 7 Issue 4, 2005
Vol 07, Issue 3, 2005
Vol 07, Issue 2, 2005
Vol 6 Issue 4, 2004
Vol 6 Issue 3, 2004
Vol 6 Issue 2, 2004
Vol 6 Issue 1, 2004
Vol 5 Issue 3, 2003
Vol 5 Issue 2, 2003
Vol 04, Issue 4, 2002
Vol 04, Issue 1, 2002
Vol 3 Issue 1-2, 2001
Vol 1 Issue 1-2, 2000
Vol 1 Issue 3-4, 1999
Vol 1 Issue 1-2, 1999
|
|