Ecology, Environment and Conservation Paper

Vol.17, Issue 3, 2011; Page No.(597-606)

QUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSIS IN RELATION TO POPULATION IMPROVEMENT IN SORGHUM (SORGHUM BICOLOR (L) MOENCH)

M.P. Deshmukh, R.B. Deshmukh and P.B. Ghorpade

Abstract

Quantitative genetics studies of the random mating sorghum ICSP 2BR/MFR population was undertaken to investigate the inheritance of grain yield and other quantitative traits and to utilize the information to make decision as to which breeding system are the most likely to be successful in achieving population improvement. Six agronomic traits were evaluated in 200 half-sibs, 200 full-sibs and 200 S1 in rabi and kharif seasons. Genetic components of variance, heritability, genetic correlations and correlated response to selection, expected genetic gain from selection and predicated gains from index selection were estimated for each trait in each type of family. The S1 families had lower mean values than full-sib and half-sib families for all the characters studied in rabi and kharif seasons, respectively. The half-sib families displayed a narrow range of values for all the traits studied than the full-sib and S1 families. The additive genetic variance ( sA ) was predominant for all the agronomic traits in both seasons. Estimates of dominance variance were negative due to sampling error and assortative mating .The estimated additive genetic variances ( A) were higher than the variances due to the average effect of gene substitution in S1 families ( A* ) for all characters under study in rabi and kharif seasons, respectively. The ratio of A* to A were less than one for all characters in both seasons. The heritability estimates, in narrow senses, on family mean basis were very high in both seasons for S1 , full-sib and half-sib families for most of the traits except for earhead girth in half-sib families for kharif season. Highly heritable traits, days to flower and plant height could easily be improved by mass selection. In S1 family testing, the expected genetic advance for seed yield per plant was 27.66 % in rabi and 21.29 % in kharif season at 10 % selection intensity. For grain yield per plant, S1 family testing and selection offers the greatest promise for population improvement than fullsib and half-sib selection. The association between days to flower and grain yield was positive, therefore the selection for grain yield alone, indicate that the population would become taller and late in maturing. In general, favorable correlated responses were predicted for most of the agronomic traits in both the seasons. The results from this study indicated the limited usefulness of index selection in this material. The performance of ICSP 2BR/MFR population is good in both rabi (77.96 g/plant ) and kharif (96.01g/plant) seasons, therefore this population may be effectively utilized in development of cultivars for rabi as well as kharif seasons.

Enter your contact information below to receive full paper.
Your Name :
Email:
Phone:
City:
Cost of Full Paper: Rs.75 for Indian Nationals or $20 (USD) for international subscribers.
By clicking on Request Paper you Agree to pay the above mentioned cost per paper.
  
Journal Issues
Vol 23, Issue 1, 2017
Vol 23, Feb 2017 Suppl. Issue
Vol 22, Dec 2016 Suppl. Issue
Vol 22, Issue 4, 2016
Vol 22, Sept. Suppl. Issue , 2016
Vol 22, Issue 3, 2016
Vol. 22, June Suppl. Issue 2016
Vol 22, Issue 2, 2016
Vol. 22, April Suppl. Issue 2016
Vol 22, Issue 1, 2016
Vol 21, Issue 4, 2015
Vol. 21 Dec. 2015 Suppl. Issue
Vol. 21 Nov. 2015 Suppl. Issue
Vol 21, Issue 3, 2015
Vol 21, Issue 2, 2015
Vol. 21 Suppl.Issue August 2015
Vol 21.Suppl.Issue June 2015
Vol 21, Issue 1, 2015
Supplement Issue, Dec. 2014
Special Issue-2014
Vol 20, Issue 4, 2014
Vol 20, Issue 3, 2014
Vol 20, Issue 2, 2014
Vol. 20 Issue 01, 2014
Vol. 19 Issue 04, 2013
Vol. 19 Issue 03, 2013
Vol. 19, Issue 02, 2013
Vol. 19, Issue 01, 2013
Vol.18, Issue 04, 2012
Vol.18, Issue 3, 2012
Vol.18, Issue 2, 2012
Vol.18, Issue 1, 2012
Vol.17, Issue 4, 2011
Vol.17, Issue 3, 2011
Vol.17, Issue 2, 2011
Vol.17, Issue 1, 2011
Vol.16, Issue 4, 2010
Vol.16, Issue 3, 2010
Vol.16, Issue 2, 2010
Vol.16, Issue 1, 2010
Vol.15, Issue 04, 2009
Vol.15, Issue 03, 2009
Vol.15, Issue 02, 2009
Vol.15, Issue 1, 2009
Vol.14, Issue 04, 2008
Vol.14, Issue 2-3, 2008
Vol.14, Issue 2-3, 2008
Vol.14, Issue 1, 2008
Vol.14, Issue 2-3, 2008
Vol.13, Issue 04, 2007
Vol.13, Issue 2, 2007
Vol.13, Issue 1, 2007
Vol.12, Issue 4, 2006
Vol.12, Issue 3, 2006
Vol.12, Issue 2, 2006
Vol.12, Issue 01, 2006
Vol.12, Issue 1, 2006
Vol.11, Issue 3,4, 2005
Vol.11, Issue 2, 2005
Vol.11, Issue 1, 2005
Vol.10, Issue 04, 2004
Vol.10, Issue 03, 2004
Vol.10, Issue 02, 2004
Vol.10, Issue 01, 2004
Vol.09, Issue 04, 2003
Vol.09, Issue 03, 2003
Vol.09, Issue 02, 2003
Vol.08, Issue 04, 2002
Vol.08, Issue 03, 2002
Vol.08, Issue 01, 2002
Vol.07, Issue 04, 2001
Vol.07, Issue 03, 2001
Vol.07, Issue 02, 2001
Vol.07, Issue 01, 2001
Vol.06, Issue 04, 2000
Vol.06, Issue 03, 2000
Vol.06, Issue 02, 2000
Vol.06, Issue 01, 2000
Vol.05, Issue 04, 1999
Vol.05, Issue 03, 1999
Vol.05, Issue 02, 1999
Vol.05, Issue 01, 1999
Vol.04, Issue 1,2, 1998
Vol.03, Issue 3,4, 1997
Vol.03, Issue 01, 1997
Vol.02, Issue 1,2, 1996
Vol.01, Issue 14, 1995
Looking for Past Issues? Click here to get them!!