Ecology, Environment and Conservation Paper

Vol 26, Issue 1, 2020; Page No.(86-94)

INFLUENCE OF CROP PROTECTIVE AGENTS ON OKRA (ABELMOSCHUS ESCULENTUS L) SEED GERMINATION AND SEEDLING EMERGENCE IN GREEN HOUSE

Pilla Venkateswara Rao, Namuduri Srinivas and Avvs Swamy

Abstract

Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L) is a very common vegetable in India. Pests like Shoot and fruit borer, leaf hopper, okra stemflymites and white fly and diseases likeyellow vein mosaic, powdery mildew and wilt are endemic in okra cultivating fields of East Godavari. To curtail these problems judicious use of crop protective agents (CPAs) are a must. Indiscriminate use of crop protective chemicals on okra crop are very dangerous for the plants and humans. To know the effect of crop protective agents on seedling emergence and early seedling growth at zero concentration to double the recommended concentration, the following trial was conducted in a green house. For this experiment shortlisted crop protective agents are Ethion (@ 1.25, 2.5, 3.75 and 5.0 ml/L), Acetamiprid (@ 0.125, 0.25, 0.375 and 0.5g/L), Flubendiamide (@ 0.15, 0.3, 0.45 and 0.6 ml/L), Emamectin Benzoate (@ 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8 g/L) and Tebuconazole & Trifloxistrobin (@ 0.625, 1.25, 1.875 and 2.5 g/L) against control (distilled water). From the experiment it is found that seed germination was significantly (P= 0.05) inhibited by all crop protective agents at all concentrations tried. Lowest seed germination was recorded in Tebuconazole + Trifloxystrobin (4.5 to 22.75%) followed by Ethion (17.5 to 48.75%), Acetamiprid (52.5 to 65.25%), Emamectin benzoate (61.25 to 70.75%) and Flubendiamdie (64.0 to 69.5%) compared with control (76%). Correlation studies revealed that seedling length was negatively correlated with Tebuconazole + Trifloxystrobin (-0.72), Ethion (-0.40), Emamectin benzoate (-0.39) and Flubendiamide (-0.37) where as Acetamiprid is neutral (0.08). Rootlets number was negatively correlated with Tebuconazole + Trifloxistrobin (r = -0.27) and Ethion (r = -0.14) while Acetamiprid (r = 0.24), Emamectin benzoate (r = 0.36) and Flubendiamide (r = 0.57) are positively correlated. Rootlets number per seedling was significantly (P=0.05) higher in all concentrations of Ethion (8.13 to 10.68), Acetamiprid (8.45 to 11.03), Emamectin benzoate (9.4 to 12.05) and Flubendiamide (2.9 to 10.43), where as in Tebuconazole +Trifloxystrobin combination (4.05 to 6.23) rootlets number was on par to the control (5.18).

Journal Issues
Vol 26, Issue 1, 2020
Vol 26, Feb Suppl. Issue, 2020
Vol 25, Issue 4 2019
Vol 25, Issue 3 2019
Vol 25, Nov Suppl. Issue, 2019
Vol 25, Sept Suppl. Issue, 2019
Vol 25, Aug Suppl. Issue, 2019
Vol 25, July Suppl. Issue, 2019
Vol 25, Issue 2 2019
Vol 25, May Suppl. Issue, 2019
Vol 25, April Suppl. Issue, 2019
Vol 25, Issue 1 2019
Vol 24, Issue 4 2018
Vol 24, Issue 3 2018
Vol 24, Issue 2 2018
Vol 24, Issue 1 2018
Vol 24, March Suppl. Issue 2018
Vol 24, Feb. Suppl. Issue 2018
Vol 23, Issue 4, 2017
Vol 23, Nov. Suppl. Issue 2017
Vol 23, Sept. Suppl. Issue 2017
Vol 23, Issue 2, 2017
Vol 23, Issue 3, 2017
Vol 23, Issue 1, 2017
Vol 23, Feb 2017 Suppl. Issue
Vol 22, Dec 2016 Suppl. Issue
Vol 22, Issue 4, 2016
Vol 22, Sept. Suppl. Issue , 2016
Vol 22, Issue 3, 2016
Vol. 22, June Suppl. Issue 2016
Vol 22, Issue 2, 2016
Vol. 22, April Suppl. Issue 2016
Vol 22, Issue 1, 2016
Vol 21, Issue 4, 2015
Vol. 21 Dec. 2015 Suppl. Issue
Vol. 21 Nov. 2015 Suppl. Issue
Vol 21, Issue 3, 2015
Vol 21, Issue 2, 2015
Vol. 21 Suppl.Issue August 2015
Vol 21.Suppl.Issue June 2015
Vol 21, Issue 1, 2015
Supplement Issue, Dec. 2014
Special Issue-2014
Vol 20, Issue 4, 2014
Vol 20, Issue 3, 2014
Vol 20, Issue 2, 2014
Vol. 20 Issue 01, 2014
Vol. 19 Issue 04, 2013
Vol. 19 Issue 03, 2013
Vol. 19, Issue 02, 2013
Vol. 19, Issue 01, 2013
Vol.18, Issue 04, 2012
Vol.18, Issue 3, 2012
Vol.18, Issue 2, 2012
Vol.18, Issue 1, 2012
Vol.17, Issue 4, 2011
Vol.17, Issue 3, 2011
Vol.17, Issue 2, 2011
Vol.17, Issue 1, 2011
Vol.16, Issue 4, 2010
Vol.16, Issue 3, 2010
Vol.16, Issue 2, 2010
Vol.16, Issue 1, 2010
Vol.15, Issue 04, 2009
Vol.15, Issue 03, 2009
Vol.15, Issue 02, 2009
Vol.15, Issue 1, 2009
Vol.14, Issue 04, 2008
Vol.14, Issue 2-3, 2008
Vol.14, Issue 2-3, 2008
Vol.14, Issue 1, 2008
Vol.14, Issue 2-3, 2008
Vol.13, Issue 04, 2007
Vol.13, Issue 2, 2007
Vol.13, Issue 1, 2007
Vol.12, Issue 4, 2006
Vol.12, Issue 3, 2006
Vol.12, Issue 2, 2006
Vol.12, Issue 1, 2006
Vol.12, Issue 01, 2006
Vol.11, Issue 3,4, 2005
Vol.11, Issue 2, 2005
Vol.11, Issue 1, 2005
Vol.10, Issue 04, 2004
Vol.10, Issue 03, 2004
Vol.10, Issue 02, 2004
Vol.10, Issue 01, 2004
Vol.09, Issue 04, 2003
Vol.09, Issue 03, 2003
Vol.09, Issue 02, 2003
Vol.08, Issue 04, 2002
Vol.08, Issue 03, 2002
Vol.08, Issue 01, 2002
Vol.07, Issue 04, 2001
Vol.07, Issue 03, 2001
Vol.07, Issue 02, 2001
Vol.07, Issue 01, 2001
Vol.06, Issue 04, 2000
Vol.06, Issue 03, 2000
Vol.06, Issue 02, 2000
Vol.06, Issue 01, 2000
Vol.05, Issue 04, 1999
Vol.05, Issue 03, 1999
Vol.05, Issue 02, 1999
Vol.05, Issue 01, 1999
Vol.04, Issue 1,2, 1998
Vol.03, Issue 3,4, 1997
Vol.03, Issue 01, 1997
Vol.02, Issue 1,2, 1996
Vol.01, Issue 14, 1995
Looking for Past Issues? Click here to get them!!